But, the terrifying part is that this is exactly what they would have wanted. It allows for the blatant retraumatization of the victims and their families.Īdditionally, the re-story-telling songs of serial killers such as Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, Jeffery Dahmer fuels their own glamorization. This is just one example of how the retelling of these true, gut wrenching experiences for public entertainment is so incredibly unethical. It brought back all the emotions I was feeling back then”, Isabell explains. That’s why it felt like reliving it all over again. Her hair was like mine, she had on the same clothes. “If I didn’t know any better, I would’ve thought it was me. They just did it.” Therefore, Netflix recreated Isabell’s raw and emotional statement, word for word, without informing her. I feel like Netflix should’ve asked if we mind or how we felt about making it. Insider performed an interview with Isbell, where she revealed that “ was never contacted about the show. One of the most noteworthy criticisms surrounds the series’ recreation of a victim impact statement given by Rita Isbell, at Jeffery Dahmer’s sentencing in 1992. The new Netflix series, “ Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story ”, has conjured a lot of criticism in the media. But, what kind of culture does this cultivate? What are the main social effects of the media shining such a blinding light on serial killers? Something about these disgustingly evil people drives the public to keep them as household names. Whether it be documentaries, true crime series, social media pages, books the consensus remains the same. This fact is what enables the fascination with serial killers, even far after their lifetimes. With every human being, lies a side that is instinctually intrigued by the most ravenous parts of humanity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |